DOI: 10.25881/20728255_2023_18_4_S1_22

Authors

Doga A.V., Borzenok S.A., Mushkova I.A., Karimova A.N., Khubetsova M.Kh., Ostrovskiy D.S., Obraztsova M.R.

S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution of the Russian Ministry of Health, Moscow

Abstract

Background. It is well known that the conjunctival epithelium contains mucin-producing goblet cells and Langerhans dendritic cells. Goblet cells of the conjunctiva secrete soluble mucins into the water-mucin layer of the tear film, performing protective and regulatory functions. In this regard, to assess the condition of the water-mucin layer of the tear film, it is possible to conduct a cytological examination of the conjunctiva in order to verify the diagnosis of dry eye syndrome.

Purpose. To assess the condition of conjunctival goblet cells in refractive profile patients at the pre- and postoperative stages.

Materials and methods. In the course of the work, two study groups were formed: the first group is patients with a verified diagnosis of dry eye syndrome and the second group is patients with initially no signs of dry eye syndrome. Patients of both groups underwent impression cytology of the bulbar conjunctiva using JET BIOFIL MCE NYLON PVDF PES PTFE CA SFCA PES Express filters after local anesthesia. The obtained samples were fixed in 96% ethyl alcohol with subsequent coloring by the CHIC – Alcian blue method (Labiko, Russia). The samples were evaluated using an inverted light phase contrast microscope IX81 (Olympus, Japan) with an integrated digital camera XC10 (Olympus, Japan). Sampling was carried out in the time before the operation, 7 days, 1.3 and 6 months after the operation.

Results and discussion. During the impression cytology of the bulbar conjunctiva in patients diagnosed with dry eye syndrome and in patients with initially no signs of xerosis of the ocular surface before and after keratorefractive surgery, a difference was noted in the distribution of the density of goblet cells depending on the area of fixation of the smear imprint on the ocular surface, the period of sampling (before and after surgery), the status of the eye surface before surgery and the type of laser vision correction technology.

Conclusion. Thus, cytological examination of the conjunctiva together with the standard diagnostic module of the ocular surface condition provides a comprehensive assessment of the pathophysiological link in verifying the diagnosis of dry eye syndrome in patients before and after keratorefractive surgery.

Keywords: dry eye syndrome, goblet cells, tear film, keratorefractive surgery.

References

1. Nelson JD. Impression cytology. Cornea. 1988;7(1):71-81.

2. Nelson J D, Wright JC. Conjunctival goblet cell densities in ocular surface disease. Arch Ophthalmol.1984;102(7):1049-51. doi:10.1001/archopht. 1984.01040030851031.

3. Thatcher RW, Darougar S, Jones, B. Conjunctival impression cytology. Arch Ophthalmol. 1977;95(4):678-681. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1977. 04450040144022.

4. Zlobin I.A., Churashov S.V., Kulikov A.N., Chirsky V.S., Chernysh V.F., Gavrilyuk I.O. Impression Cytology as a Method of Cytological Diagnostics in Ophthalmology. Literature Review. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2023; 20(1):53-60 [URL] (in Russ.).

5. Egbert PR, Lauber S, Maurice DM. A simple conjunctival biopsy. Am J Ophthalmol.1977;84(6):798-801. doi: 10.1016/0002‑9394(77)90499‑8.

6. Tseng SC. Staging of conjunctival squamous metaplasia by impression cytology. Ophthalmology. 1985;92(6):728-733. doi: 10.1016/s0161‑6420 (85)33967‑2.

7. Tseng SC. Concept and application of limbal stem cells. Eye (Lond). 1989;3:141-157. doi: 10.1038/eye.1989.22.

8. Pearse AG. Histochemistry: Theoretical and Applied. 1960:1(2): 55-64.

9. Kunert KS, Tisdale AS, Gipson IK. Goblet cell numbers and epithelial proliferation in the conjunctiva of patients with dry eye syndrome treated with cyclosporine. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:330-337. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.3.330.

10. McManus JF. Histological and histochemical application of periodic acid. Coloring Technology.1948: 23(3): 99-108. doi: 10.3109/10520294809106232.

11. Kumar P, Bhargava R, Kumar M, Ranjan S, Kumar M,Verma P. The Correlation of Routine Tear Function Tests and Conjunctival Impression Cytology in Dry Eye Syndrome. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2014; 28(2): 122-129. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2014.28.2.122.

12. Nelson JD, Havener VR, Cameron JD. Cellulose acetate impressions of the ocular surface. Dry eye states. Arch Ophthalmol. 1983;101(12):1869-1872. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1983.01040020871007.

13. Singh R, Joseph A, Umapathy T. Impression cytology of the ocular surface. Br J Ophtalmol. 2005;89(12):1655-1659. doi: 10.1136 / bjo.2005.073916.

14. Pflugfelder SC, Tseng SC, Yoshino K, Monroy D, Felix C, Reis BL. Correlation of goblet cell density and mucosal epithelial membrane mucin expression with rose bengal staining in patients with ocular irritation. Ophthalmology. 1997;104(2):223-235. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30330-3.

15. Shiboski SC, Shiboski CH , Criswell LA, Baer AN, Challacombe S, Lanfranchi H, Schiødt M, Umehara H, Vivino F, Zhao Y, Dong Y, Greenspan D, Heidenreich AM, Helin P, Kirkham B, Kitagawa K, Larkin G, Li M, Lietman T, Lindegaard J, McNamara N, Sack K, Shirlaw P, Sugai S, Vollenweider C, Whitcher J, Wu A, Zhang S, Zhang W, Greenspan JS, Daniels TE. American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for Sjögren’s syndrome: a data-driven, expert consensus approach in the Sjögren’s International Collaborative Clinical Alliance cohort. Arthritis Care Res. (Hoboken). 2012; 64(4):475-487. doi: 10.1002/acr.21591.

16. Khimani KS, Go JA, Souza RG, Mitchell T, Yu Z, Paiva CS, Saumur M, Stephen C. Regional Comparison of Goblet Cell Number and Area in Exposed and Covered Dry Eyes and Their Correlation with Tear MUC5AC. Sci Rep. 2020; 10: 2933. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59956-7.

17. Eroğul Ö, Balcı A, Gobeka H, Efe N, Akdoğan M, Oral AY, Doğan M, Özdemir Ç, Kaşıkçı M,Saraçlı S. Conjunctival Impression Cytology and Tear Film Changes in Sarcoidosis: A Subjective and Objective Diagnosis Study. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2023; 53(4): 200-205. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2022.58153.

18. Lin T, Filek R, Wang JM, Wu Ch.W, Liu H, Hutnik C. Impression cytology implicates cell autophagy in aqueous deficiency dry eye. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017; 11: 773-779. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S124889.

19. Pflugfelder SC, De Paiva CS, Moore QL, Volpe EA, Li DQ, Gumus K, Zaheer ML, Corrales RM. Aqueous tear deficiency increases conjunctival interferon-γ (IFN-γ) expression and goblet cell loss. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56:7545-7550. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-17627.

20. Nicolle P, Liang H, Reboussin E, Rabut G, Warcoin E, Brignole-Baudouin F, Melik-Parsadaniantz S , Baudouin Ch, Labbe A, Goazigo AR. Proinflammatory markers, chemokines, and enkephalin in patients suffering from dry eye disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(4):1221. doi: 10.3390/ijms19041221.

21. Goyal S, Chauhan SK, Zhang Q, Dana R. Amelioration of murine dry eye disease by topical antagonist to chemokine receptor 2. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2009;127(7):882-887. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.125.

22. Shu Ch.W, Bee YS, Chen JL,Tsen Ch.L,Tsai WL, Sheu SJ,Jan YK. Detection of Autophagy-Related Gene Expression by Conjunctival Impression Cytology in Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(2): 296. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11020296.

23. Athmanathan S, Bandlapally SR, Rao GN. Collection of corneal impression cytology directly on a sterile glass slide for the detection of viral antigen: An inexpensive and simple technique for the diagnosis of HSV epithelial keratitis – A pilot study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2001; 1: 3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-1-3.

For citation

Doga A.V., Borzenok S.A., Mushkova I.A., Karimova A.N., Khubetsova M.Kh., Ostrovskiy D.S., Obraztsova M.R. The main aspects of the impression cytology of the bulbar conjunctiva. Bulletin of Pirogov National Medical & Surgical Center. 2023;18(4,supplement):22-25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25881/20728255_2023_18_4_S1_22