DOI: 10.25881/20728255_2022_17_4_S1_67

Authors

Babaeva D.B., Shishkin M.M.

Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center, Moscow

Abstract

The aim of this work was to study the role of the vitreous in the pathogenesis of diabetic vitreopapillary traction syndrome. Methods: We observed 70 diabetic patients with vitreopapillary tractional syndrome. The group included patients with its initial manifestations without fibrovascular membrans, as well as patients with the presence of a pronounced fibrovascular proliferation fixed to the optic nerve disk. All patients underwent standard ophthalmologic examinations and B-scan ultrasonography, OCT, perimetry, fluorescent angiography. All of them underwent vitreoretinal surgery, the purpose of which was to eliminate the traction component the vitreous.Results: Kinetic B-scan ultrasonography test unlike standard digital ultrasonography allowed to assess the mobility limitation of the vitreous and traction effect. OCT results demonstrate vitreopapillary fixation and parapapillary posterior vitreous detachment. Analysis of perimetry results showed that all patients had central and paracentral scotomas. Conclusions: The results of our own observations indicate that the biomechanical impact of vitreous on the optic nerve (an increase in traction) affects the progression of diabetic vitreopapillary traction syndrome and is one of the reasons for the deterioration of visual functions in this category of patients.

Keywords: vitreopapillary traction syndrome, vitreoretinal surgery, proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

References

1. Belikova S.V. Eksperimental’noe obosnovanie sposoba kontrastirovaniya struktur steklovidnogo tela s ispol’zovaniem suspenzii «Vitreokontrast». Avtoreferat dissertacii. 2012. (in Russ.)

2. Kroll P., Wiegand W., Schmidt J.C. (1999): Vitreopapillary traction in proliferative diabetic vitreoretinopathy. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1999; v 83: p. 261–264.

3. Pendergast SD, Martin DF, Proia AD, Jaffe GJ, McCuen BW II. Removal of optic disc stalks during diabetic vitrectomy. Retina. 1995; 15 p.25-28.

4. Schepens C.L. Clinical aspects of pathologic changes in the vitreous body. Am.J.Ophthalmol. 1954; v 38, p. 8-21.

5. Sebag J. Anomalous posterior vitreous detachment: a unifying concept in vitreo-retinal disease. Graefes Arch. Clin.Exp.Ophthalmol. 2004 Aug; v 242(8), p. 690-698.

6. Walton, K.A. Age-Related Changes in Vitreous Mobility as Measured by Video B Scan Ultrasound / K.A. Walton, C.H. Meyer, C.J. Harkrider et al. // Experim. Eye Research. — 2002. — Vol. 74, N. 2. — P. 173–180.

7. Wisotsky B.J., Magat-Gordon C.B., Puklin J.E. Vitreopapillary traction as a cause of elevated optic nerve head. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998 v 126 p. 137-139.

8. Yuldasheva N.M. Proliferativnaya dibaeticheskaya retinopatiya: novye aspekty patogeneza, obosnovanie sistemy shchadyashchej vitreoretinal’noj hirurgii i kompleksnoj farmakoterapii: Avtoreferat dissertacii. 2014. (in Russ.)

For citation

Babaeva D.B., Shishkin M.M. Role of the vitreous in the pathogenesis of diabetic vitreopapillary traction syndrome. Bulletin of Pirogov National Medical & Surgical Center. 2022;17(4,supplement):67-69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25881/20728255_2022_17_4_S1_67