DOI: 10.25881/20728255_2022_17_1_121

Authors

Bocharov A.V.1, 3, Popov L.V.2, Mittsiev A.K.3, 4, Lagkuev M.D.3

1 Kostroma Regional Clinical Hospital named after Korolev E.I., Kostroma

2 Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center, Moscow

3 Republican Clinical Hospital, Vladikavkaz

4 North-Ossetian State Medical Academy, Vladikavkaz

Abstract

Rationale: currently, the problem of mammarocoronary shunt dysfunction remains urgent, one of the most frequent causes of which is the occurrence of competitive blood flow, which leads to shunt occlusion.

Purpose and methods: in the presented work, using the example of a clinical case, the cause of competitive blood flow in a mammarocoronary shunt is shown, which ultimately led to the emergence of acute coronary syndrome without ST segment elevation, as well as the logic of deciding on the volume of revascularization and the result of the use of endovascular methods to reduce competitive blood flow.

Conclusion: in the interventional treatment of acute coronary syndrome in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting, it is necessary to assess the blood flow rate in the shunts, perform not only shuntography, but also angiography of the subclavian arteries if mammarocoronary shunts were formed, and also when planning and performing endovascular treatment, it is necessary to take into account possible causes of competitive blood flow not only before but also after it.

Keywords: сompetitive blood flow, acute coronary syndrome, mammary coronary bypass, stenting.

References

1. Desperak P, Hawranek M, Hrapkowicz T, Zembala MO, Gasior M. Comparison of multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe coronary artery disease presenting with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Kardiol. Pol. 2018; 76(10): 1474-1481. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2018.0151.

2. Sabik JF, Blackstone H. Coronary artery bypass graft patency and competitive flow. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008; 51: 126-128. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.029.

3. Nakajima H, Kobayashi J, Toda K, Fujita T, Shimahara Y, Kasahara Y, еt al. Angiographic evaluation of flowdistribution in sequential and composite arterial grafts for three vessel disease. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2012; 41: 763-769. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezr057.

4. Nordgaard H, Swillens A, Nordhaug D, Kirkeby-Garstad I, Loo DV, Vitale N, et al. Impact of competitive flow on wall shear stress in coronary surgery: computational fluid dynamics of a LIMA — LAD model. Cardiovasc. Res. 2010; 88: 512-519. doi: 10/1093/cvr/cvq210.

5. Bocharov AV, Popov LV. Competitive blood flow: definition, biophysical basis, mechanisms of occurence in clinical practice, clinical and angiographic diagnostic criteria. Clinical Physiology in Circulation. 2021; 18(2): 165-171 (In Russ). doi: 10.24022/1814-6910-18-2-165-171.

For citation

Bocharov A.V., Popov L.V., Mittsiev A.K., Lagkuev M.D. Subclavian artery stenting as a method of endovascular reduction of competitive blood flow in mammarocoronary shunt in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome without ST segment elevation. Bulletin of Pirogov National Medical & Surgical Center. 2022;17(1):121-124. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25881/20728255_2022_17_1_121