Authors
Hanaliev B.V., Magomedov A.M., Matveev S.A., Magomedov Sh.S.
Federal State Budgetary Institution “National Medical and Surgical Center named after N.I. Pirogov” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Abstract
The article presents the results of a review of the literature on complications of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Based on the analysis, the main groups of complica- tions of surgery are formed, the frequency of their occurrence and ranking by severity are given. The factors influencing the frequency of complications and repeated hospitalizations are considered separately.
According to the results, a number of conclusions were made: in the periopera- tive period, complications of mild severity predominate; the most frequent intraoperative complication is damage to internal organs; intraoperative blood loss rarely exceeded 300 ml; the most common causes of repeated hospitalizations are infectious complications and lymphocele.
Keywords: robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, complications, prostate cancer.
References
1. Aboyan, I.A. Robot-assistirovannaya radikal’naya prostatektomiya. Opyt pervyh 100 operacij / I. A. Aboyan, S. M. Pakus, S. V. Grachev i dr. // Urologicheskie vedomosti. — 2015 — T. V, № 1. — S. 12.
2. Bezrukov, E.A. Evolyuciya tekhniki vypolneniya i roli radikal’noj prostatektomii / E.A. Bezrukov, L.M. Rapoport, A.O. Morozov i dr. // Sibirskoe medicinskoe obrazovanie. — 2017 — № 3 — S.
3. Veliev, E.I. Migraciya klipsy v mochevoj puzyr’ posle roboticheskoj radikal’noj prostatektomii / E.I. Veliev, A.A. Tomilov, A.B. Bogdanov i dr. // Onkourologiya. — 2016 — T. 12, № 2. — S.
4. Katibov, M.I. Sravnenie otkrytoj, laparoskopicheskoj i robotizirovannoj radikal’nyh prostatektomij po klinicheskim rezul’tatam i stoimosti lecheniya (obzor literatury) / M.I. Katibov, O.I. Apolihin // Vestnik Rossijskogo nauchnogo centra rentgenoradiologii Minzdrava Rossii — 2011. — № 11. — S.
5. Kolontarev, K.B. Sravnenie rezul’tatov vypolneniya otkrytoj i robot-assistirovannoj radikal’noj prostatektomii. Obzor literatury / K.B. Kolontarev, A.V. Govorov, D.Yu. Pushkar’ // Onkourologiya i andrologiya. — 2012. — № 03(95). — S.
6. Nesterov, S.N. Robot-assistirovannaya laparoskopicheskaya prostatektomiya: nash opyt / S.N. Nesterov, V.V. Rogachikov, K.P. Tevlin i dr. // Onkourologiya. — 2011. — № 3. — S.
7. Pushkar’, D.Yu. Radikal’naya prostatektomiya s roboticheskoj assistenciej: analiz pervyh 80 sluchaev / D.Yu. Pushkar’, P.I. Rasner, K.B. Kolontarev // Onkourologiya. — 2010. — № 3. — S.
8. Rasner, P.I. Sravnitel’nyj analiz funkcional’nyh rezul’tatov radikal’noj pozadilonnoj i robot-assistirovannoj prostatektomii u bol’nyh lokalizovannym rakom predstatel’noj zhelezy / P.I. Rasner, D.V. Kotenko, K.B. Kolontarev i dr. // Eksperimental’naya i klinicheskaya urologiya. — 2014. — № 4. — S.
9. Rasner, P.I. Oslozhneniya robot-assistirovannoj radikal’noj prostatektomii i faktory riska ih vozniknoveniya / P.I. Rasner, D.V. Kotenko, D.Yu. Pushkar’ i dr. // Vestnik Nacional’nogo mediko-hirurgicheskogo Centra im. N.I. Pirogova. — 2015. — T. 10, № 1. — S.
10. Savel’ev, V.S. Klinicheskaya hirurgiya: nacional’noe rukovodstvo / V.S. Savel’ev, A.I. Kirienko. — M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2009 — T. II. — s.
11. Strat, A.A. Hirurgiya raka predstatel’noj zhelezy s ispol’zovaniem robot-assistirovannoj tekhnologii: avtoreferat dis... kandidata med. nauk/ A.A. Strat. — Moskva, 2013. — 28 s.
12. Alvin L.W. Oncological outcomes following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in a multiracial Asian population / L.W. Alvin, S.H. Gee, H.H. Hong et al. // J Robot Surg. — 2015. — Sep;9(3). — P.
13. Badani K.K. Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 2766 procedures / K.K. Badani, S. Kaul, M. Menon // Cancer. — 2007. — Nov; 110(9). — P.
14. Cambell-Walsh urology / A.J. Wein [et al.]. — China: Elsevier, 2016. — 4903 p.
15. Carneiro A. Higher number of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy cores is associated with higher blood loss and perioperative complications in robot assisted radical prostatectomy / A. Carneiro, A. Sivaraman, R. Sanchez-Salas et al. // Actas Urol Esp. — 2017. — Apr;41(3). — P.
16. Choi E.S. Effects of recruitment manoeuvre on perioperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: A randomised single-blinded trial / E.S. Choi, A.Y. Oh, C.B. In et al. // PLoS One. — 2017. — Sep 6;12(9). — e0183311.
17. Coelho R.F. Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robot-AssistedRadical Prostatectomy: A Critical Reviewof Outcomes Reported by High-Volume Centers / R. F. Coelho, B. Rocco, M.B. Patel et al // Journal of endourology. — 2010. — Dec;24(12). — P.
18. Di Pierro G.B. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the setting of previous abdominal surgery: Perioperative results, oncological and functional outcomes, and complications in a single surgeon’s series / G.B. Di Pierro, P. Grande, L. Mordasini et al. // Int J Surg. — 2016. — Dec;36(Pt A). — P.
19. Ficarra V. A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution / V. Ficarra, G. Novara, S. Fracalanza et al. // BJU Int — 2009. — Aug;104(4) — P.
20. Ficarra V. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotassisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies / V. Ficarra, G. Novara, W. Artibani, et al. // Eur Urol — 2009. — May;55(5). — P.
21. Gonzalgo M.L. Classification and trends of perioperative morbidities following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy / M.L. Gonzalgo, C.P. Pavlovich, B.J. Trock et al. // J Urol — 2005. — Jul:174(1). — P.
22. Guillonneau B. Laparoscopic prostatectomy: assessment after 550 procedures / B. Guillonneau, X. Cathelineau, J.D. Doublet et al. // Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. — 2002. — Aug;43(2). — P.
23. Guillonneau B. Laparoscopic management of rectal injury during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy / B. Guillonneau, R. Gupta, H. El Fettouh et al. // J Urol. — 2003. — May;169(5). — P.1694—6.
24. Hirasawa Y. Impact of Surgeon and Hospital Volume on the Safety of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Multi-Institutional Study Based on a National Database / Y. Hirasawa, K. Yoshioka, Y. Nasu et al. // Urol Int. — 2017. — 98(3). — P.
25. Huang X. Comparison of perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes between standard laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systemic review and meta-analysis / X. Huang, L. Wang, X. Zheng et al. // Surg Endosc. — 2017. — Mar;31(3). — P.
26. Ilic D. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer / D. Ilic, S.M. Evans, C.A. Allan et al. // Cochrane Database Syst Rev. — 2017. — Sep;12(9). — P.
27. Jacobsen A. Anastomotic complications after robot-assisted laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy / A. Jacobsen, K.D. Berg, P. Iversen et al. // Scand J Urol. — 2016. — Aug;50(4). — P.
28. Katz R. Operative management of rectal injuries during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy / R. Katz, T. Borkowski, A. Hoznek et al. // Urology. — 2003. — Aug;62(2) — P.310—3.
29. Kilic O.F. Effects of steep Trendelenburg position for robotic-assisted prostatectomies on intra- and extrathoracic airways in patients with or without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/ O.F. Kilic, A. BoÈrgers, W. KoÈhne et al. // Br J Anaesth. — 2015. — 114(1). — P.
30. Koc G. Lower extremity neuropathies after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy on a split-leg table / G. Koc, N.N. Tazeh, F.N. Joudi et al. // J Endourol. — Aug;26(8). — P.
31. Kocarek J. Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy — results of 1500 surgeries / J. Kocarek, J. Heracek, M. Cermak et al. // Rozhl Chir. — 2017. — 96. — P.
32. Liss M.A. Outcomes and complications of pelvic lymph node dissection during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy / M.A. Liss, K. Palazzi, S.P. Stroup et al. // World J Urol. — 2013. — Jun;31(3). — P.
33. Moschini M. Incidence and Predictors of
34. Novara G. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy / Novara G, Ficarra V, Mocellin S et al. // Eur Urol — 2012. — Sep;62(3). — P.
35. Secin F.P. Multi-institutional study of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in prostate cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy / F.P. Secin, T. Jiborn, A.S. Bjartell et al. // Eur Urol — 2008. — 53(1). — P.134—45.
36. Simmons M.N. Outcomes and Complications of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy in a Community Hospital Setting / M.N. Simmons, M. Fitts, T. Krigbaum et al. // Urology. — 2016. — Oct;96. — P.
37. Song W. Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes and Complications According to Surgical Approach to Radical Prostatectomy: Special Focus on the Perineal Approach / W. Song, J.H. Park, H.G. Jeon et al. // Clin Genitourin Cancer. — 2017. — Aug; 15(4). — P.
38. Tang K. Robotic vs. Retropubic radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer: A systematic review and an meta-analysis update / K. Tang, K. Jiang, H. Chen et al. // Oncotarget. — 2017. — May 9;8(19). — P.
39. Touijer K. Oncologic outcome after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 10 years of experience / K. Touijer, F.P. Secin, A.M. Cronin et al. // Eur. Urol. — 2009. — May;55(5). — P.
40. Yaxley J.W. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study / J.W. Yaxley, G.D. Coughlin, S.K. Chambers et al. // Lancet. — 2016. — Sep 10;388(10049). — P.
