DOI: 10.25881/BPNMSC.2018.70.61.019

Authors

Kalinin R.E., Suchkov I.A., Mzhavanadze N.D., Povarov V.O.

Ryazan State Medical University, Ryazan, Russia

Abstract

Aim: to study the quality of life in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices and the possibility of using the Aquarel questionnaire for its evaluation.

Methods: the study included 100 patients, 55 men and 45 women aged from 40 to 84 years. All patients had indications for implantation of the pacemaker. The quality of life was evaluated before the intervention, 1, 6 and 12 months after it, using the “Quality of life and related events” questionnaire, Aquarel, specialized for patients with pacemakers.

Results: 58 double-chamber and 42 single-chamber pacemakers were successfully implanted in patients. The quality of life in the first month after the operation increased by an average of 10-20%: the lower the initial values of quality of life, the higher the increase. In follow-up, the quality of life gradually decreased, but did not reach the baseline. Patients with atrioventricular block had the lowest quality of life, then it gradually increased, while the remaining patients showed an increase with a further decrease. Women and patients with diabetes mellitus had lower quality of life. The association with age, body mass index, type of device, number of leads, operation technique, concomitant diseases and complications of implantation has not been revealed.

Conclusions: Aquarel questionnaire can be used to assess the quality of life in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Implantation of the pacemaker positively affects the quality of life, especially in the early postoperative period, in the later follow-up period there was a gradual decline in indicators.

Keywords: cardiac implantable electronic devices, pacing, quality of life.

References

1. Agapov, A.B. Pryamye peroral’nye antikoagulyanty v lechenii pacientov s trombozom glubokih ven nizhnih konechnostej. / A.B. Agapov, I.A. Suchkov, A.N. Ryabkov // Nauka molodyh — Eruditio Juvenium. — 2016. — № 2. — S. 147-157.

2. Kalinin, R.E. Vozmozhnosti farmakoterapii hronicheskoj venoznoj nedostatochnosti preparatami diosmina s pozicii funkcional’nogo sostoyaniya endoteliya / R.E. Kalinin [i dr.] //Angiologiya i sosudistaya hirurgiya. — 2015. — T. 21, № 3. — S. 91-97.

3. Kalinin, R.E. Ocenka effektivnosti i bezopasnosti razlichnyh variantov antikoagulyantnoj terapii pri venoznyh trombozah. / R.E. Kalinin [i dr.] // Novosti hirurgii. — 2015. — T. 23, № 4. — S. 416-423.

4. Kalinin, R.E. Emboloopasnost’ ostrogo voskhodyashchego tromboflebita poverhnostnyh ven nizhnih konechnostej. / R.E. Kalinin, M.V. Narizhnyj, I.A Suchkov // Rossijskij mediko-biologicheskij vestnik im. akademika I.P. Pavlova. — 2011. — № 2. — S. 19.

5. Barros, R.T. Evaluation of patients’ quality of life aspects after cardiac pacemaker implantation / R.T. Barros [et al.] // Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. — 2014. — T. 29, № 1. — P. 37-44.

6. Fleischmann, K.E. Pacemaker implantation and quality of life in the Mode Selection Trial (MOST) / K.E. Fleischmann [et al.] // Heart Rhythm. — 2006. — № 3. — R. 653–9.

7. Lopez-Jimenez, F. Health values before and after pacemaker implantation / F. Lopez-Jimenez [et al.] // Am Heart J. — 2002. — № 144. —P. 687–92.

8. Newman, D. Effect of pacing mode on health-related quality of life in the Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing / D. Newman [et al.] // Am Heart J. — 2003. — № 145. — P. 430–7.

9. Newman, D. Relationships between pacing mode and quality of life: evidence from randomized clinical trials. / D. Newman // Card Electrophysiol Rev. — 2003. — № 7. — P. 401–5.

10. Oliveira, B.G. Health-related quality of life in Brazilian pacemaker patients / B.G. Oliveira [et al.] // Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. — 2008. — T. 31, № 9. — P. 1178-83.

11. Oliveira, B.G. The Portuguese version, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of specific quality-of-life questionnaire — AQUAREL — for pacemaker patients / B.G. Oliveira [et al.] // Arq Bras Cardiol. — 2006. — T. 87, № 2. — P. 75-83.

12. Stofmeel, M.A. Changes in quality-of-life after pacemaker implantation: responsiveness of the Aquarel questionnaire / M.A. Stofmeel [et al.] // Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. — 2001. — T. 24, № 3. — P. 288-95.

13. Stofmeel, M.A. Psychometric properties of Aquarel. A disease-specific quality of life questionnaire for pacemaker patients / M.A. Stofmeel [et al.] // J Clin Epidemiol. — 2001. — T. 54, № 2. — P. 157-65.

14. Stofmeel, M.A. Quality-of-life of pacemaker patients: a reappraisal of current instruments / M.A. Stofmeel [et al.] // Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. — 2000. — T. 23, № 6. — P. 946-52.

15. Udo, E.O. Long term quality-of-life in patients with bradycardia pacemaker implantation. / E.O. Udo [et al.] // Int J Cardiol. — 2013. — T. 168, № 3. — P. 2159–2163.

16. Weitz, J.I. Rivaroxsban or aspirin for extended treatment of venous thromboembolism / J.I. Weitz [et al.] // New England Journal of Medicine. — 2017. — T. 376, № 13. — P. 1211-1222.

For citation

Kalinin R.E., Suchkov I.A., Mzhavanadze N.D., Povarov V.O. Application of aquarel questionaire in assessment of quality of life in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Bulletin of Pirogov National Medical & Surgical Center. 2018;13(3):85-88. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25881/BPNMSC.2018.70.61.019