Authors
Ermakov D.Yu.
Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center, Moscow
Abstract
This manuscript discusses modern invasive methods for detecting myocardial ischemia in interventional cardiology: fractional flow reserve, instantaneous wave-free ratio. The prospects of introducing new electrophysiological methods for the implementation of intraoperative monitoring of the state of the heart muscle are analyzed.
Keywords: fractional flow reserve, instantaneous wave-free ratio, ECG from the coronary sinus, myocardial ischemia.
References
1. Alekyan BG, Grigor'yan AM, Staferov AV. Rentgenendovaskulyarnaya diagnostika i lechenie zabolevanii serdtsa i sosudov v Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Moscow: La Grafik; 2017. 220 p.
2. Darenskii DI, Gramovich VV, Zharova EA, et al. The diagnostic value of measuring the momentary blood flow reserve versus non-invasive methods to detect myocardial ischemia in assessing the functional significance of borderline coronary artery stenoses. Ter Arkh. 2017;89(4):15–21. Doi: 10.17116/terarkh201789415-21.
3. Darenskii DI, Gramovich VV, Zharova EA, et al. Comparison of diagnostic values of instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve with noninvasive methods for evaluating myocardial ischemia in assessment of the functional significance of intermediate coronary stenoses in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease. Kardiologiia. 2017;57(8):11–19. Doi: 10.18087/cardio.2017.8.10012.
4. Darenskii DI, Gramovich VV, Zharova EA, et al. Optimal cut-off points of instantaneous wave-free ratio in the assessment of the functional significance of coronary artery stenoses using noninvasive methods as reference. Evraziiskii kardiologicheskii zhurnal. 2016;(4):34–41.
5. Matchin YuG, Gramovich VV, Darenskii DI, et al. Method of instantaneous wave-free ratio in comparison with fractional flow reserve in assessment of the physiological significance of intermediate coronary stenosis. Kardiologicheskii vestnik. 2015;10(1):38–43.
6. Prishchep OA, Maksimkin DA, Faibushevich AG, et al. The significance of modern intravascular imaging of coronary arteries in the examinationof professional competence and the diagnosis of coronary heartdisease. Trudnyi patsient. 2016;14(10-11):10–15.
7. Prishchep OA, Maksimkin DA, Shugushev ZKh. The role of intravascular methods of research to verify the diagnosis of coronary heart disease in workers of JSC "Russian railways" related to the safety of train traffic. RUDN Journal of Medicine. 2017;21(2):246-258. Doi: 10.22363/2313-0245-2017-21-2-246-258.
8. Shevchenko YuL, Borisov IA, Viller AG, Pet al. Vozmozhnosti sovremennykh endovaskulyarnykh tekhnologii v lechenii tyazhelykh form ishemicheskoi bolezni serdtsa. Kachestvo zhizni. Meditsina. 2003;2:28.
9. Shevchenko Yu.L., Maslennikov M.A., Ermakov D.Yu., Gerashchenko A.V., Vahrameeva A.YU. Vnutriserdechnaya elektrokardiografiya iz venechnogo sinusa kak unificirovannyj metod monitoringa stepeni i lokalizacii ishemii miokarda pri endovaskulyarnyh vmeshatel'stvah na koronarnyh arteriyah. Vestnik Natsional'nogo mediko-khirurgicheskogo Tsentra im. N.I. Pirogova. 2020;15(2):26–30.
10. Shevchenko YuL, Sveshnikov AV, Marchak DI, et al. Elektrokardiografiya iz venechnogo sinusa pri vnutriserdechnykh vmeshatel'stvakh. Vestnik Natsional'nogo mediko-khirurgicheskogo Tsentra im. N.I. Pirogova. 2019;14(1):4–11.
11. Abo-Aly M, Lolay G, Adams C, et al. Comparison of intracoronary versus intravenous adenosineinduced maximal hyperemia for fractional flow reserve measurement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;94(5):714–721. Doi: 10.1002/ccd.28317.
12. Agostini D, Roule V, Nganoa C, et al. First validation of myocardial flow reserve assessed by dynamic 99mTc-sestamibi CZT-SPECT camera: head to head comparison with 15O-water PET and fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. The WATERDAY study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45(7):1079–1090. Doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-3958-7.
13. Berry C, McClure JD, Olroyd KG. Meta-Analysis of death and myocardial infarction in the DEFINE-FLAIR and iFR-SWEDEHEART trials. Circulation. 2017;136(24):2389–2391. Doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030430.
14. Berry C, van’t Veer M, Witt N. VERIFY (VERification of Instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity in everydaY practice). A Multicenter study in consecutive patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(13):1421–1427. Doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.09.065.
15. Bruyne De B, Pijls NH, Barbato E, et al. Intracoronary and intravenous adenosine 5’-triphosphate, adenosine, papaverine, and contrast medium to assess fractional flow reserve in humans. Circulation. 2003;107(14):1877–1883. Doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000061950.24940.88.
16. Danad I, Raijmakers PG, Driessen RS, et al. Comparison of coronary CT angiography, SPECT, PET, and hybrid imaging for diagnosis of ischemic heart disease determined by fractional flow reserve. JAMA Cardiology. 2019;2(10):1100–1107. Doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2471.
17. Escaned J, Echavarría-Pinto M, Garcia-Garcia HM, et al. Prospective assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of instantaneous wave-free ratio to assess coronary stenosis relevance: results of advise II international, multicenter study (adenosine vasodilator independent stenosis evaluation II). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(6):824–833. Doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.01.029.
18. Jerabek S, Kovarnik T. Technical aspects and limitations of fractional flow reserve measurement. Acta Cardiologica. 201974(1):9–16. Doi: 10.1080/00015385.2018.1444951.
19. Jeremias, A., Kirtane AJ, Stone GW. A test in context: fractional flow reserve: accuracy, prognostic implications, and limitations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(22):2748–2758. Doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04.019.
20. Megaly M, Khalil C, Saad M, et al. Outcomes with deferred versus performed revascularization of coronary lesions with gray-zone fractional flow reserve values. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(12):e008315. Doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.
21. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(2):87–165. Doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394.
22. Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-Year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(3):177–184. Doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.012.
23. Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis. 5-Year Follow-Up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(21):2105–2111. Doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.087.
24. Sen S, Asrress KN, Nijjer S, et al. Diagnostic classification of the instantaneous wave-free ratio is equivalent to fractional flow reserve and is not improved with adenosine administration. Results of CLARIFY (Classification Accuracy of Pressure-Only Ratios Against Indices Using Flow Study). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(13):1409–1420. Doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.034.
25. Sen S, Escaned J, Malik IS, et al. Development and validation of a new adenosine independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave–intensity analysis results of the ADVISE (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(15):1392–1402. Doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.003.
26. Shevchenko YuL, Marchak DI, Gerashchenko AV, Ermakov DYu. Pre-operative preparation and electrophysiological monitoring of the myocardium state with heart endovascular interventions. In: Scientific research of the SCO countries: synergy and integration. Part 1: Participants’ reports in English. Beijing; 2019. P. 159–167.
27. Soares A, Brown DL. The fallacies of fractional flow reserve. Int J Cardiol. 2019;302:34–35. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.12.040.
28. Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for CardioThoracic Surgery (EACTS) Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J. 2014;35(37):2541–2619. Doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278.
