DOI: 10.25881/20728255_2024_19_3_118

Authors

Eliseev I.G.1, Lischuk A.N.1, Havandeev M.L.1, Muzichin A.L.3, Komendantova Yu.V.4, Gitelzon E.A.2, Faibushevich A.G.2

1 The National Medical Research Center of High Medical Technologies – the Central Military Clinical Hospital of A.A. Vishnevsky, Krasnogorsk

2 RUDN University, Moscow

3 RKB named after M.I. Kalinin, Donetsk

4 Russian State Social University, Moscow

Abstract

The paper highlights the evolution of mitral valve prosthetics, from the first developments to modern innovative technologies. The history of development of prosthetic methods both in Russia and in the world, their effectiveness, advantages and disadvantages, as well as the latest developments in the practice and technology of mitral valve prosthesis are considered. The article also provides an overview of the results of clinical trials conducted using different types of prostheses and their impact on survival and quality of life of patients. The problems faced by physicians and researchers in this field are analyzed, and the prospects for the development of mitral valve prosthetics are discussed.

Keywords: cardiology, surgical techniques, mitral valve, prosthesis, bioprostheses.

References

1. Bokeria LA, et al. Nacional’nye rekomendacii po vedeni’u, diagnostike I lecheni’u klapannych porokov serdca. Rabochaya gruppa po razrabotke recomendacii. M.: Izd-vo im AN Bakuleva RAMN, 2009. 356 р. (In Russ.)

2. Urmanbetov KS, et al. Istoriya razvitiya khirurgicheskogo lecheniya mitralnogo poroka serdca (obzor literaturi). Vestnik Kirgizskoi gosudarstvennoi medicinskoi akademii im. I.K. Ahunbaeva. 2022; 3: 10-17. (In Russ.)

3. Cohn LH, Edward GS. The evolution of mitral valve surgery: 1902–2002. American Heart Hospital Journal. 2003; 1(1): 40-46. doi: 10.1111/ j.1541-9215.2003.02081.x.

4. Cushing H, Branch B. Experimental and clinical notes on chronic valvular lesions in the dog and their possible relation to a future surgery of the cardiac valves. The Journal of Medical Research. 1908; 17(4): 471.

5. Bernheim BM. Experimental surgery of the mitral valve. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1909; 20: 107-110.

6. Jeger E. Die Chirurgie der Blutgetasse und des Herzens. Berlin, Germany: August Hirschwald, 1913.

7. Carrel A, Th T. Etude anatomopathologique et experimentale sur la chirurgie des orifices du coeur. Presse méd. 1914; 22: 173-177.

8. Cutler EC, Samuel AL. Cardiotomy and valvulotomy for mitral stenosis; experimental observations and clinical notes concerning an operated case with recovery. The Boston Medical and Surgical Journal. 1923; 188.26: 1023-1027. doi: 10.1056/NEJM192306281882601.

9. Ellis LB, Dwight E. Closed valvuloplasty for mitral stenosis: a twelve-year follow-up study of 1571 patients. New England Journal of Medicine. 1964; 270.13: 643-650. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196403262701301.

10. Lillehei CW, et al. The surgical treatment of stenotic or regurgitant lesions of the mitral and aortic valves by direct vision utilizing a pump-oxygenator. Journal of Thoracic Surgery. 1958; 35.2: 154-191. doi: 10.1016/S0096-5588(20)30271-3.

11. Shevchenko YuL, Cvetkova TV, Gudymovich VG, Vasilashko VI. Long-term result of mitral and aortic heart valve replacement with domestic ball prostheses 35 years after the operation (clinical observation with review of the literature). Vestnik Nacional’nogo mediko-khirurgicheskogo Centra im. N.I. Pirogova. 2020; 15(3-2): 172-178. (In Russ.) doi: 10.25881/BPNMSC.2020.46.81.030.

12. Iskusstvennye klapany serdca. Pod red. YUL SHevchenko. SPb.: OLMA Media Grupp, 2007. 448 р. (In Russ.)

13. Gibbon Jr, John H. Application of a mechanical heart and lung apparatus to cardiac surgery. Minn Med. 1954; 37.3: 171-180.

14. Cohn LH, Edward GS. The evolution of mitral valve surgery: 1902–2002. American Heart Hospital Journal. 2003; 1.1: 40-46. doi: 10.1111/ j.1541-9215.2003.02081.x.

15. Westaby S, Cecil B. Landmarks in cardiac surgery. 1997. (No Title).

16. Starr A, Lowell E. Mitral replacement: clinical experience with a ball-valve prosthesis. Annals of surgery. 1961; 154.4: 726. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196110000-00017.

17. Carpentier A, et al. Biological factors affecting long-term results of valvular heterografts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1969; 58.4: 467-83.

18. Cohn LH, et al. Fifteen-year experience with 1678 Hancock porcine bioprosthetic heart valve replacements. Annals of Surgery. 1989; 210.4: 435. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198910000-00003.

19. Jones EL, et al. Ten-year experience with the porcine bioprosthetic valve: interrelationship of valve survival and patient survival in 1,050 valve replacements. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 1990; 49.3: 370-384. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(90)90240-7.

20. Schoen FJ, John J, Collins Jr, Lawrence H. Long-term failure rate and morphologic correlations in porcine bioprosthetic heart valves. The American journal of cardiology. 1983; 51.6: 957-964. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149 (83)80173-8.

21. Fedorov SA, et al. Comparative assessment of clinical and hemodynamic outcomes after aortic heart valve replacement with xenoaortic and xenopericardial biological prostheses for degenerative aortic valvular disease. Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2018; 7(2): 50-60. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17802/ 2306-1278-2018-7-2-50-60.

22. Ganyukov VI, Tarasov RS, Ganyukov IV. Transseptal transcatheter mitral valve replacement. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020; 25(8): 3842. (In Russ.) doi: 10.15829/ 1560-4071-2020-3842.

23. Klyshnikov KU, et al. functional characteristics of biological protection «Uniline». Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2017; 3: 6-12. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17802/2306-1278-2017-6-3-6-12.

24. Klyshnikov KYu, et al. Repeated valve replacement: approaches and devices (literature review). Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2023; 22(2): 3377. (In Russ.) doi: 10.15829/1728-8800-2023-3377.

25. Proskurin DA. Protezirovanie mitral’nogo klapana. Alleya nauki. 2018; 3(7): 17-20. (In Russ.)

26. Vogt S, et al. Heart valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley and St Jude Medical prostheses: A randomized comparison in 178 patients. European Heart Journal. 1990; 11.7: 583-591. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a059763.

27. Murday AJ, et al. A prospective controlled trial of St. Jude versus Starr Edwards aortic and mitral valve prostheses. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2003; 76.1: 66-73. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)00118-8.

28. Burckhardt D, et al. Clinical evaluation of the St. Jude Medical heart valve prosthesis: A two-year follow-up of 150 patients. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 1984; 88.3: 432-438.

29. Daemen JHT, et al. Right minithoracotomy versus median sternotomy for reoperative mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2018; 54.5: 817-825. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy173.

30. Karpenko IG, et al. Sovremennye metody osteosinteza grudiny posle prodol’noj sredinnoj sternotomii (obzor literatury) Journal of New Medical Technologies, e -edition. 2022; 16(2): 30-43. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17116/Cardiobulletin20231801149.

31. Harky A, et al. Left atrial or transeptal approach for mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Current Problems in Cardiology. 2021; 46.3: 100602. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2020.100602.

32. Carpentier A, et al. Open-heart operation under videosurgery and minithoracotomy. First case (mitral valvuloplasty) operated with success. Comptes rendus de l’Academie des sciences. Serie III, Sciences de la vie. 1996; 319.3: 219-223.

33. Chernov II, et al. The first experience of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. Clinical and Experimental Surgery. Petrovsky Journal. 2013; 2(2): 20-23. (In Russ.)

34. SHevchenko YUL, Pyatirichenko IA. Pravostoronnij dostup v hirurgii mnogoklapannyh porokov. Grudnaya i serdechno-sosudistaya hirurgiya. 1997; 2: 51. (In Russ.)

35. Pidanov OYu, et al. Minimally invasive surgery in patients with mitral valve disease. Grudnaya i Serdechno-Sosudistaya Khirurgiya. 2018; 60(1): 19-27. (In Russ.) doi: 10.24022/0236-2791-2018-60-1-19-27.

36. Kondratyev DA, et al. Right minithoracotomy as safe and effective approach for surgical treatment of mitral valve dysplasia. Clinical and Experimental Surgery. Petrovsky Journal. 2020; 8(3): 40-50. (In Russ.) doi: 10.33029/2308-1198-2020-8-3-40-50.

37. Evseev EP, et al. Surgical treatment of heart diseases through the rightsided minithoracotomy. Russ. Jour. of Card. and Cardiovasc. Surg. 2021; 14(1): 26-31. (In Russ.)

38. Shcherbatyuk KV, Komarov RN, Pidanov OYu. Right thoracotomy approach for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2019; 12: 121‑125. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17116/hirurgia2019121121.

For citation

Eliseev I.G., Lischuk A.N., Havandeev M.L., Muzichin A.L., Komendantova Yu.V., Gitelzon E.A., Faibushevich A.G. Evolution of mitral valve replacement. Bulletin of Pirogov National Medical & Surgical Center. 2024;19(3):118-122. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25881/20728255_2024_19_3_118