Authors
Maslyakov V.V.1, 2, Salov I.A.1, Kapralov S.V.1, Parshin A.V.1, Dralina O.I.2, Barsukov V.G.2, Polidanov M.A.2
1 Saratov State Medical University named after V.I. Razumovsky, Saratov
2 Private institution educational organization of higher education «Medical University «Reaviz»
Abstract
Goal. To study changes in cellular immunity indicators in patients with penetrating gunshot wounds of the pelvis in the immediate postoperative period.
Materials and methods. The study included 40 female patients from the civilian population who were treated for penetrating gunshot wounds of the pelvis received as a result of local hostilities. All patients were female, the average age was 36±4 years. Two clinical groups were formed. In the first (A), the wounded were selected in the number of 20 (50%) people, whose time interval did not exceed 60 minutes, in the second (B) — 20 (50%) wounded, whose time interval exceeded 60 minutes. To achieve this goal, a study of laboratory parameters characterizing cellular immunity was conducted: the total number of leukocytes in peripheral blood, lymphocytes (%), determining changes in subpopulations of both T-lymphocytes and B-lymphocytes. The number of mature T lymphocytes (CD3+); T helper cells (CD4+); cytotoxic T cells (CD8+); natural killers (CD16+); B cells (CD20+) was calculated.
Results. As a result of the study, it was found that changes in the cellular link of the immune system in gunshot wounds of the pelvis depend on the time elapsed from the moment of injury to the beginning of surgical intervention. At the same time, if surgical intervention was performed up to one hour from the moment of injury, changes in the subjects occurred later and recovered earlier compared to the group of wounded who underwent surgical intervention later than one hour from the moment of injury.
Keywords: pelvic injuries, cellular immunity, postoperative period.
References
1. Zolotukhin SE, Yudin VA, Shpachenko NN, Chirakh TM. Features of immunological reactivity in victims with polytrauma in the early period of traumatic illness. University Clinic. 2016; 12(2): 39-43. (In Russ.)
2. Kalinkin OG. Traumatic illness. Trauma. 2013; 14(3): 59-65. (In Russ.)
3. Firsov SA, Matveev RP. Mechanisms of the immune response in traumatic disease complicated by nosocomial pneumonia in victims of road traffic accidents depending on alcohol abuse in anamnesis. Fundamental Research. 2014; 10(8): 1582-1586. (In Russ.)
4. Korsakov IN, Voskanyan SE, Naydenov EV, et al. Dependence of the frequency of infectious complications of interventions on abdominal organs on the severity of the immune response to surgical trauma. Saratov Scientific Medical Journal. 2013; 9(4): 954-957. (In Russ.)
5. Semenov AV, Sorokovikov VA. Scales for assessing the severity and predicting the outcome of injuries. Polytrauma. 2016; 2: 80-90. (In Russ.)
6. Gumanenko EK, Boyarintsev VV, Suprun TYu, Lyashedko PP. Objective estimation of injury severity (the education guid-ance). Saint Petersburg, 1999. Р.3-5. (In Russ.)
7. Maslyakov VV, Pavlova ON, Fedotova NN, et al. Features of changes in immune status indicators in ischemic stroke in the acute period, taking into account gender differences. Russian Immunological Journal. 2020; 23(1): 51-60. (In Russ.) doi: 10.46235/1028-7221-006-GISО.
