Authors
Ilyalov S.R.1, Banov S.M.2, Golanov A.V.2, Usachev D.Yu.2
1 Russian Medical Academy of Additional Professional Education, Moscow
2 National medical research center of neurosurgery named after N.N. Burdenko, Moscow
Abstract
Background: understanding the patterns of development of post-radiation pseudoprogression is an actual task in the treatment of patients with vestibular schwannomas, since it allows not only to justify the selection of patients for radiosurgical treatment, but also to optimize their subsequent follow-up in order to assess the immediate and long-term results of treatment.
Aims: to study for post-radiation dynamics of changes in the volume of vestibular schwannomas depending on the observation time after stereotactic radiosurgery.
Material and methods: the study included 541 patients: the ratio of men to women was 1:3, the median follow-up was 55 months. The average age was 48.2 years (18–80). The mean initial volume of vestibular schwannomas was 4.1 cm3 (0.1–14.5). The dynamics of changes were assessed by volumetric comparison on a workstation equipped with Leksell Gamma Plan 10.1 software. An analysis of the dynamics of changes in the volume of schwannomas after radiosurgery was carried out on the basis of the initial tumor volume, the maximum magnitude of the change in volume and the time it was achieved, and the tumor volume at the time of the last observation. Analysis of changes in the volume of schwannomas was carried out at intervals of 12 months after radiosurgery.
Results: In 59.7%, vestibular schwannomas progressively decreased after radiosurgery, and post-radiation pseudoprogression occurred in 40.3% of cases. Typical pseudoprogression is characterized by development after irradiation and has either a short course with an early (11.7 months) peak increase in tumor volume and complete reverse development after 24–36 months, or a protracted course with a late (38.1 months) peak (p<0. 0001) and complete reverse development after 60–72 months. Atypical development of pseudoprogression after progressive tumor reduction requires a differential diagnosis with tumor recurrence, which requires a control MRI after 12 months to assess the dynamics of further changes in tumor volume. Re-enlargement of a vestibular schwannoma after previous pseudoprogression most likely corresponds to tumor recurrence.
Conclusion: post-radiation pseudoprogression of vestibular schwannomas is a frequent phenomenon with a different course — short and protracted. Monitoring of patients with prolonged pseudoprogression requires MRI for at least 6 years after radiosurgery to reliably assess the treatment outcome. Atypical development of pseudoprogression after progressive reduction requires differential diagnosis with tumor recurrence.
Keywords: Gamma Knife radiosurgery, vestibular schwannomas, pseudoprogression.
References
1. Patients Treated with Leksell Gamma Knife. Leksell Gamma Knife Society, 1968-2021. [cited 09.03.2024] Available from: https://www.lgksociety.com/library/annual-treatment-statistics-1.
2. Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD, McLaughlin MR, Flickinger JC. Long-term outcomes after radiosurgery for acoustic neuromas. In The New England journal of medicine. 1998; 339(20): 1426-1433. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199811123392003.
3. Yu CP, Cheung JY, Leung S, Ho R. Sequential volume mapping for confirmation of negative growth in vestibular schwannomas treated by gamma knife radiosurgery. JNS. 2000; 93(3): 82-89. doi: 10.3171/jns.2000.93.supplement.
4. Pollock BE. Management of vestibular schwannomas that enlarge after stereotactic radiosurgery: treatment recommendations based on a 15 year experience. Neurosurgery. 2006; 58(2): 241-88. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU. 0000194833.66593.8B.
5. Hasegawa T, Kida Y, Yoshimoto M, Koike J, Goto K. Evaluation of tumor expansion after stereotactic radiosurgery in patients harboring vestibular schwannomas. Neurosurgery. 2006; 58(6): 1119-28. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000215947.35646.DD.
6. Delsanti C, Roche P-H, Thomassin J-M, Régis J. Morphological changes of vestibular schwannomas after radiosurgical treatment: pitfalls and diagnosis of failure. Progress in neurological surgery. 2008; 21: 93-97. doi: 10.1159/000156712.
7. Shimanskiĭ VN, Odamanov DA, Ryzhova MV, et al. Surgical approach to resection of vestibular schwannomas following stereotactic radiological treatment. Surgical outcomes and morphological changes in tumors after radiotherapy. Voprosy Neirokhirurgii. 2018; 82(6): 38‑52. (In Russ.)
8. Meijer OWM, Weijmans EJ, Knol DL, Slotman BJ, et al. Tumor-volume changes after radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: implications for follow-up MR imaging protocol. AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology. 2008; 29(5): 906-910. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0969.
9. Zemskova OV. The role of radiosurgery in the combined treatment of large vestibular schwannomas. Ukr Neurosurg J. 2015; 2: 64-9. (In Russ.)
10. Régis J, Delsanti C, Roche P-H. Editorial: Vestibular schwannoma radiosurgery: progression or pseudoprogression? Journal of neurosurgery. 2017; 127(2): 374-379. doi: 10.3171/2016.7.JNS161236.
11. Breshears JDЮ Chang J, Molinaro AM, et al. Temporal Dynamics of Pseudoprogression After Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas-A Retrospective Volumetric Study. Neurosurgery. 2019; 84(1): 123-131. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy019.
12. Li L-F, Yu C-P, Tsang AC-O, et al. Near-complete regression 19 years after Gamma Knife radiosurgery of vestibular schwannoma with massive pseudoprogression: case report. Journal of neurosurgery. 2020; 134(5): 1455-1458. doi: 10.3171/2020.3.JNS20389.
13. Wage J, Mignano J, Wu J. Tufts Medical Center Experience With Long-Term Follow-Up of Vestibular Schwannoma Treated With Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery: Novel Finding of Delayed Pseudoprogression. Advances in radiation oncology. 2021; 6(4): 100687. doi: 10.1016/j. adro.2021.100687.
14. Fouard O, Daisne JF, Wanet M, Regnier M, Gustin T. Long-term volumetric analysis of vestibular schwannomas following stereotactic radiotherapy: Practical implications for follow-up. Clinical and translational radiation oncology. 2022; 33: 1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.12.003.
15. Rueß D, Schütz B, Celik E, et al. Pseudoprogression of Vestibular Schwannoma after Stereotactic Radiosurgery with Cyberknife®: Proposal for New Response Criteria. Cancers. 2023; 15(5). doi: 10.3390/cancers15051496.
16. Frisch CD, Jacob JT, Carlson ML, et al. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Cystic Vestibular Schwannomas. Neurosurgery. 2017; 80(1): 112-118. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001376.
17. Klijn S, Verheul JB, Beute GN, et al. Gamma Knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas: evaluation of tumor control and its predictors in a large patient cohort in The Netherlands. JNS. 2016; 124(6): 1619-1626. doi: 10.3171/2015.4.JNS142415.
18. Da Hygino C, Rodriguez I, Domingues RC, Gasparetto EL, Sorensen AG. Pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse: imaging challenges in the assessment of posttreatment glioma. AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology. 2011; 32(11): 1978-1985. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2397.
19. Trunin YuYu, Golanov AV, Konovalov AN, Pronin IN. Pseudoprogression of intracranial pilocytic astrocytomas and other low-grade gliomas. Burdenko’s Journal of Neurosurgery. 2020; 84(6): 106-112. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17116/neiro202084061106.
20. Maksoud Z, Schmidt MA, Huang Y, et al. Transient Enlargement in Meningiomas Treated with Stereotactic Radiotherapy. Cancers. 2022; 14(6). doi: 10.3390/cancers14061547.
