Authors
Tarasova N.K.1, Mizgirev D.V.1, Oblitsova Z.G.2
1 Federal state budgetary educational institution of higher education «Northern state medical University» of the Ministry of health of the Russian Federation, Arkhangelsk
2 Private educational institution of higher education «Institute of management», Arkhangelsk
Abstract
A comparative analysis of the results of the evaluation of the written exam in the discipline «faculty surgery» students of the medical faculty during the survey.The results of the written exam revealed the subjective attitude of students to the non-traditional form of the exam, objectivity and fairness of evaluation. The method provides objectivity assessing encourages students to change the standard view of the preparation for the exam (memorization of theoretical material), increases the possibility of implementing common requirements for the discipline «faculty surgery» for all students and the possibility of a more complete coverage of the material of the discipline due to the combined type of tasks, saves time teacher on the exam.
Keywords: medical education, written exam, didactics, situational problem, faculty surgery, trainees.
References
1. Baidenko VI, Oskarsson B. Bazovye navyki (klyuchevye kompetentsii) kak integriruyushchii faktor obrazovatel’nogo protsessa. In: Professional’noe obrazovanie i formirovanie lichnosti spetsialista. Moscow; 2002. P. 22–46. (In Russ).
2. Golub BA. Osnovy obshchei didaktiki. Moscow: Vlados; 1999. 96 p. (In Russ).
3. Dyn’kov SM, Duberman BL, Oblitsova ZG, et al. Teoriya i metodika prepodavaniya distsipliny «khirurgicheskie bolezni» v meditsinskom vuze. Arkhangelsk: Izdatelctvo CGMU, 2018. (In Russ).
4. Zinov’ev SI. Uchebnyi protsess v sovetskoi vysshei shkole. Moscow: 1968. 359 p. (In Russ).
5. Mizgirjov DV, Vasileva EYu. Assessment of graduates’ practical skills on surgery in medical school. Bulletin of Pirogov National Medical & Surgical Center. 2018;13(4):107–109. (In Russ). doi: 10.25881/BPNMSC.2018.41.16.022.
6. Pedagogika i psikhologiya. Part 1. Pedagogika vysshei shkoly. In: Sistema pedagogicheskikh nauk i svyaz’ pedagogiki s drugimi naukami. Moscow; 2012. 122 p. (In Russ).
7. Podlasyi IP. Pedagogika. Novyi kurs. In 2 vol. Obshchie osnovy. Protsess obucheniya. Vol.1. Moscow: Vlados; 2001. 576 p. (In Russ).
8. Sbornik testovykh zadanii dlya studentov 4 kursa lechebnogo fakul’teta dlya provedeniya promezhutochnogo kontrolya (kursovogo ekzamena). Ed by S.M. Dyn’kov. Arkhangelsk: Izdatelctvo CGMU; 2018. 78 p. (In Russ).
9. Standart situatsionnoi klinicheskoi zadachi po khirurgicheskim boleznyam. Ed by N.K. Tarasova. Arkhangelsk: SGMU; 2017. 34 p. (In Russ).
10. Tomilova MI, Vasilyeva EYu, Kharcova OA. Assessment of high school knowledge in student perception. Ecology, human. 2013;(9):29–33. (In Russ).
11. Gary T. Obrazovanie. Ochen’ kratkoe vvedenie. Moscow: Izdatel’skii dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki; 2016. (In Russ).
12. Federal’nyi gosudarstvennyi obrazovatel’nyi standart vysshego professional’nogo obrazovaniya (060101 Lechebnoe delo) [cited 12 Nov 2019]. (In Russ). Available at: https://eduscan.net/standart/060101.
13. Shaposhnikov VI, Asharaf MH, Gedson RV, Marchenko NV. Problemy sovremennogo meditsinskogo obrazovaniya. Megdunarodnyi zhyrnal eksperimental’nogo obrazovaniya. 2012;(4 Pt 2):272–274. (In Russ).
14. Vernon PE. Intelligence and achievement tests. London: University and London Press; 1960.
