Authors
Dmitriev N.V.1, Lazutin A.S.2, Klimshin S.B.2, Litvinovskij I.S.2, Masljakov V.V. 3, Sidelnikov S.A.3
1 St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, St. Petersburg
2 Northwestern District Scientific and Clinical Center named after L.G. Sokolov, St. Petersburg
3 Saratov State Medical University named after V.I. Razumovsky, Saratov
Abstract
The article presents an analysis of the literature data on the provision of care to patients with severe injuries. It has been established that in the Russian Federation to this day there is no generally accepted system for assessing the severity of injury. The absence of a single standard in principle does not allow analyzing the effectiveness of a particular therapeutic tactic. When analyzing the Russian literature on the problem of trauma, there is an exceptional variety of evaluation tools used. Predictive scales are often used to retrospectively assess the severity of injury, or statistical tools of injury severity are used for forecasting. A number of domestic researchers resort to using the American system. However, the following important aspect should be noted here, the use of these scales provides for special education and is an intellectual product of this organization and its use by untrained persons carries the threat of incorrect use. In addition to the tool for assessing the severity of injury, measures are needed to collect information about the injured. A single database allows you to analyze the dynamics by region and country, evaluate the effectiveness of measures to improve the quality of care. The attention of the state, a systematic approach and sufficient funding have a positive effect on the survival of victims. There is no reliable evidence of the effect of the trauma system itself. Copying foreign models is pointless and harmful, the trauma system model should be developed taking into account local peculiarities. The inclusive model is the most promising. The impact on the survival of delivery times and personnel qualifications has been reliably proven.
Keywords: assistance, severe trauma, scales, traumatic shock, trauma centers.
References
1. MacKenzie EJ, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases an injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2013; 380: 2197-2223.
2. World Health Organization, Department of Violence. Injury prevention and disability. Injuries and violence. Geneva: WHO; 2010.
3. Lendrum RA, Lockey DJ. Trauma system development. Anaesthesia. 2013 J; 68(1): 30-9.
4. Sturm JA. Trauma Care in Germany: An Inclusive System Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 471(9): 2912-2923. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2967-x.
5. Danielle AP, Brian B, Gregory JJ. Trauma Systems: Origins, Evolution, and Current Challenges. Surgical Clinics of North America. 2017; 97(5): 947-959. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2017.06.011.
6. Order of the Ministry of Health and Social Development of the Russian Federation No. 332 dated July 11, 2008 “On the procedure for organizing monitoring of the implementation of measures aimed at improving the organization of medical care for victims of road accidents”. (In Russ.)
7. Cowley RA, Hudson F, Scanlan E et al. An economical and proved helicopter program for transporting the emergency critically ill and injured patient in Maryland. J Trauma 1973; 13(12): 1029-38. doi: 10.1097/00005373-197312000-00001.
8. Waters JM Jr, Wells CH. The effects of a modern emergency medical care system in reducing automobile crash deaths. J Trauma 1973; 13(7): 645-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-197307000-00009.
9. West JG, Trunkey DD, Lim RC. Systems of trauma care. A study of two counties. Arch Surg. 1979; 114(4): 455-60. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1979. 01370280109016.
10. Danielle A, Beldowicz B, Jurkovich GJ. Trauma Systems: Origins, Evolution, and Current Challenges Surgical Clinics of North America. 2017; 97(5): 947-959. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2017.06.011.
11. Pracht EE, Langland-Orban B, Tepas JJ et al. Analysis of trends in the Florida Trauma Systems (1991-2003) changes in mortality after establishment of new centers. Surgery. 2006; 140(1): 34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.surg. 2006.01.012.
12. Glen H. Tinkoff, Reed JF, Megargel R, at al. Delaware’s Inclusive Trauma System: Impact on Mortality. J Trauma. 2010; 69: 245-252. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e493b9.
13. Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 927n dated November 15, 2012 “On approval of the Procedure for providing medical care to victims with combined, multiple and isolated injuries accompanied by shock”. (In Russ.)
14. Order of the Ministry of Health and Social Development of the Russian Federation No. 332 dated July 11, 2008 “On the procedure for organizing monitoring of the implementation of measures aimed at improving the organization of medical care for victims of road accidents”. (In Russ.)
15. Federal target program “Improving road safety in 2006-2012” (approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated February 20, 2006 №100). (In Russ.)
16. Report to the Government of the Russian Federation on the results of the implementation and effectiveness of the Federal Target Program “Improving Road Safety in 2006-2012”. (In Russ.)
17. Malanin DA, Bosko OYu. Methods of objective assessment of the severity of injuries and their practical application Methodological recommendations. Volgograd State Medical University, 2008. 15 p. (In Russ.)
18. Shock: theory, clinic, organization of anti-shock care. G.S. Mazurkevich, S.F. Bagnenko, editors. St. Petersburg: Polytechnic, 2004. Р.121. (In Russ.)
19. Shapot YUB, Seleznev SA, Kurshakova IV et al. The practical value of some prognostic scales in traumatic illness. Bulletin of Surgery named after I.I. Grekov. 2011; 170(2): 57-62. (In Russ.)
20. Nwomeh BC, Wendi Lowell, Renae Kable et al. Haley and Emmanuel A Ameh History and development of trauma registry: lessons from developed to developing countries. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2006; 1: 32. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-1-32.
21. Federal Statistical observation Form №14 “Information on the activities of medical organization units providing medical care in stationary conditions”. Approved by Rosstat Order №591 dated November 27, 2015 “On Approval of Statistical Tools for the Organization by the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation of Federal Statistical Surveillance in the Field of healthcare. (In Russ.)
22. Grechukhin IV, Andreev MK, Dianov SV, et al. The advantages of analyzing the main indicators of inpatient care for traumatological patients using a regional personalized information system. International Research Journal. 2018; 11(65). Part 4: 8-11. (In Russ.) doi: 10.23670/IRJ.2017.65.129.
23. Ungureanu TN, Kudryavtsev AV, Anfimov VG et al. The first municipal register of injuries in Russia: creation, logistics and role in the city injury prevention program. Human ecology. 2017; 3: 56-64. (In Russ.) doi: 10.33396/1728-0869-2017-3-56-64.
24. Carmont MR The Advanced Trauma Life Support course: a history of its development and review of related literature. Postgrad Med J. 2005; 81: 87-91. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2004.021543.
25. Alarhayem A, Myers JG, Dent D, et al. Time is the enemy: Mortality in trauma patients with hemorrhage from torso injury occurs long before the “golden hour”. Am J Surg. 2016; 212(6): 1101-1105. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.08.018.
26. Gofrit ON, Leibovici D, C Shapira S, at al The trimodal death distribution of trauma victims: military experience from the Lebanon war. Mil Med. 1997; 162: 24-26.
27. Lerner EB, Moscati RM. The golden hour: scientific fact or medical “urban legend”? Acad Emerg Med. 2001; 8(7): 758-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb00201.x.
28. Trunkey DD. Trauma. Accidental and intentional injuries account for more years of life lost in the U.S. than cancer and heart disease. Among the prescribed remedies are improved preventive efforts, speedier surgery and further research. Sci Am. 1983; 249: 220-227.
29. Ball CG, Williams BH, Tallah C, et al. The impact of shorter prehospital transport times on outcomes in patients with abdominal vascular injuries. J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 2013; 7: 11. doi:10.1186/1752-2897-7-11.
30. Blow O, Magliore L, Claridge JA et al. The Golden Hour and the Silver Day: Detection and Correction of Occult Hypoperfusion within 24 Hours Improves Outcome from Major Trauma. Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection & Critical Care. 1999; 47(5): 964. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199911000-00028.
31. Hirshberg A, Mattox K. Top Knife: The Art and Craft of Trauma Surgery tfm Publishing. 2005; 36(9): 1145. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2005.01.025.
32. Lamb CM, MacGoey P, Navarro AP et al. Damage control surgeryin the era of damage control resuscitation. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2014; 113(2): 242-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu233.
33. Belskikh AN, Samokhvalov IM. Guidelines for military field surgery 8th ed., reprint. M.: Main Military Medical Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, 2013. 474 p. (In Russ.)
34. Evans C, Howes D, Pickett W, et al. Audit filters for improving processes of care and clinical outcomes in trauma systems. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009; 4: CD007590. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007590.pub2.
35. Vali Y, Rashidian A, Jalili M, et al. Effectiveness of regionalization of trauma care services: a systematic review. Public health. 2017; 146: 92-107. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.12.006.
36. Henry JA, Reingold AL. Prehospital trauma systems reduce mortality in developing countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012; 73: 261-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31824bde1e.
