Authors
Teplovodskaya V.V., Antonova O.P., Sudakova E.P., Gasanova H.S., Shikhalieva E.A.
S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution
Abstract
Relevance. High myopia is one of the actual and modern problems in ophthalmology. Implantation of phakic intraocular lenses is considered the most optimal way to correct it today, having a number of advantages: the possibility of saving accommodation, accuracy and predictability of calculations, simultaneous compensation of high values of refractive anomaly of the optical system of the eye, a significant improvement in the quality of life and restoration of working capacity, a short rehabilitation period, as well as the reversibility of the technique, which does not require the presence of expensive equipment and is available for mastering. Despite the fact that these operations have been carried out for decades around the world, and surgical technology and lens calculation techniques are brought to automatism, there are still risks of developing various postoperative complications. The aim of the study: to present a clinical case of rotation of a phakic intraocular lens, which resulted in the development of severe secondary glaucoma with corneal dystrophy. Materials and methods: under the supervision was the patient D. 36 years old, who was implanted with phakic IOL in both eyes in August 2020 due to high myopia at the place of residence. In January 2021, the patient noted a decrease in visual acuity of the right eye, during the examination, a rotation of phakic IOL by more than 60 degrees and a rise in intraocular pressure were revealed. Conclusion: the correct selection of patients and their follow-up in the postoperative period is necessary for the safety, effectiveness and possibility of obtaining high functional and refractive results when using this method of correction of high myopia.
Keywords: high myopia, phakic intraocular lenses, refractive surgery.
References
1. Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, Jong M, Naidoo KS, Sankaridurg P, Wong TY, Naduvilath TJ, Resnikoff S. Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016 May;123(5):1036-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006
2. Wu PC, Chuang MN, Choi J, Chen H, Wu G, Ohno-Matsui K, Jonas JB, Cheung CMG. Update in myopia and treatment strategy of atropine use in myopia control. Eye (Lond). 2019 Jan;33(1):3-13. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0139-7.
3. Lipson MJ, Brooks MM, Koffler BH. The Role of Orthokeratology in Myopia Control: A Review. Eye Contact Lens. 2018 Jul;44(4):224-230. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000520.
4. Morgan IG, French AN, Ashby RS, Guo X, Ding X, He M, Rose KA. The epidemics of myopia: Aetiology and prevention. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2018 Jan;62:134-149. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.09.004
5. Yang W, Liu S, Li M, Shen Y, Zhou X. Visual Outcomes after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK for High Myopia. Ophthalmic Res. 2020;63(4):427-433. doi: 10.1159/000504304.
6. Branchevskii S.L., Ivanov D.V. Rezul’taty rogovichnoi i intraokulyarnoi khirurgicheskoi korrektsii miopii vysokoi stepeni // Sovremennye tekhnologii kataraktal’noi i refraktsionnoi khirurgii —2011: Materialy nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. — M., 2011. — S. 60-63 (in. Russ).
7. Barsam A., Allan B.D. Excimer laser refractive surgery versus phakic intraocular lenses for the correction of moderate to high myopia// Cochrane Database Syst Rev. — 2012. — Vol.18. — №1. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007679.
8. Barsam A, Allan BD. Excimer laser refractive surgery versus phakic intraocular lenses for the correction of moderate to high myopia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 17;(6):CD007679. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007679.
9. Chen D, Zhao X, Chou Y, Luo Y. Comparison of Visual Outcomes and Optical Quality of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted SMILE and Visian Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL V4c) Implantation for Moderate to High Myopia: A Meta-analysis. J Refract Surg. 2022 Jun;38(6):332-338. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20220411-01
10. Jonker SMR, Berendschot TTJM, Saelens IEY, Bauer NJC, Nuijts RMMA. Phakic intraocular lenses: An overview. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec;68(12):2779-2796. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2995_20.
11. Teplovodskaya VV, Sobolev NP, Morina NA, Zhuravlev AS, Sudakova EP. Correction of ametropia with posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens. Vestnik Oftalmologii. 2022;138(1):64-70. (In. Russ.) doi: 10.17116/oftalma202213801164.
12. Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Silverman RH, Rondeau MJ, Coleman DJ. Correlation of anterior chamber angle and ciliary sulcus diameters with white-to-white corneal diameter in high myopes using artemis VHF digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg. 2009 Feb;25(2):185-94. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20090201-03
13. Ghoreishi M, Abdi-Shahshahani M, Peyman A, Pourazizi M. A model for predicting sulcus-to-sulcus diameter in posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens candidates: correlation between ocular biometric parameters. Int Ophthalmol. 2019 Mar;39(3):661-666. doi: 10.1007/s10792-018-0859-5
14. Igarashi A, Shimizu K, Kato S, Kamiya K. Predictability of the vault after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Aug;45(8):1099-1104. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.02.020.
15. Kohnen T, Kook D, Morral M, Güell JL. Phakic intraocular lenses: part 2: results and complications. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Dec;36(12):2168-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.10.007
16. Vargas V, Alio JL. Refractive outcomes and complications following angle supported, iris fixated, and posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses bilensectomy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan;32(1):25-30. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000716
17. Sobolev N.P., Malyugin B.E., Pokrovskiy D.F., Patakhova H.M. Surgical experience with angle-supported phakic IOLs for high myopia correction. Ophthalmosurgery. 2013; 4:. 20-24. (In Russ.)
18. Kohnen, Thomas MD, PhD, FEBO*; Kook, Daniel MD; Morral, Merce MD; Güell, Jose Luis MD Phakic intraocular lenses, Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 2010; 36(12): 2168-2194. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.10.007.
