Authors
Fedorov V.Je. 1, Haritonov B.S.1, Aslanov A.D.2, Logvina O.E.2, Masljakov V.V.3
1 Saratov State Medical University named after V.I. Razumovsky, Saratov
2 Kabardino-Balkarian State University named after H.M. Berbekova, Nal'chik
3 Mari State University, Joshkar-Ola
Abstract
Purpose. Improving the results of treatment of complications of cholelithiasis manifested by mechanical jaundice.
Materials and methods. The experience of diagnosis and treatment of 537 patients with complications of cholelithiasis, manifested by mechanical jaundice, was analyzed. The first stage was 537 minimally invasive decompressions of the biliary tract, the second-500 different types of endosurgical interventions.
Results. Depending on the tactical principles, all the subjects were divided into two groups. In one (control) group (n = 249), patients were admitted from 2010 to 2014. Their treatment was empirical: decompression of the bile tree was performed at different times, and surgery was performed without taking into account the stages of the pathological process and the severity of the patients. In the other analyzed group (n = 251), patients were admitted to the hospital from 2015 to 2019. Their treatment tactics were personalized: taking into account the stages of mechanical jaundice. individual terms of decompression of the bile ducts and the choice of surgical intervention were determined. When comparing the results obtained, the advantage of the personalized approach was established: a decrease in the percentage of postoperative complications and mortality was revealed.
Conclusion. In cholestasis in patients with cholelithiasis and jaundice, the severity of the condition is due to hyperbilirubinemia. Stage 2 of mechanical jaundice-determined by the severity of cytolysis in hepatic insufficiency, manifested by hypertransaminasemia. The severity of cholangitis is determined by purulent-inflammatory, as well as septic signs of the disease, characterized by leukocytosis, circulating immune complexes and medium-weight molecules. In the cholestatic stage of jaundice development, treatment is planned, in the cytolytic stage — urgent, and in cholangitis-emergency. The use of personalized tactics for the treatment of patients with breast cancer has reduced the number of complications and mortality.
Keywords: cholelithiasis, mechanical jaundice, cholestasis, cytolisis, cholangitis, cholecystectomy.
References
1. Zarkua NJe. Differential diagnostic tactics for mechanical jaundice. Vestnik hirurgii im. I.I. Grekova. 2013; 172 (1): 38-44. (In Russ).
2. Galperin EI, Mamonova ON. Classification of the severity of obstructive jaundice. Hirurgija. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova. 2014; 1: 5-9. (In Russ).
3. Gohil Y, Goswami K, Patel S, et al. Ultrasonography in obstructive jaundice — a pictorial essay. Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging. 2006; 16(4): 91-93.
4. Mayorov MM, Dryazhenkov IG. Mechanical jaundice of calculous etiology: pathogenesis, complications and treatment tactics. Klinicheskaja medicina. 2012; 5: 12-16. (In Russ).
5. Ermolov AS, Gulyaev AA, Samsonov VT, et al. Modern approaches to the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Al`manah Instituta hirurgii imeni A.V. Vishnevskogo (XVIII S``ezd Obshestva endoskopicheskih khirurgov Rossii Moskva. 17-19 fevralya 2015 g.). 2015; 1: Tez. 81. (In Russ).
6. Takada T. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: updated Tokyo Guidelines for the management of acute cholangitis/acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018; 25(1): 3-16. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.526.
7. Takada T, Toshihiko T, Mayumi T. Accuracy of the Tokyo Guidelines for the diagnosis of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis taking into consideration the clinical practice pattern in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018; 18(2): 250-257. doi:10.1007/s00534-010-0338-5.
8. Kovalevsky AD. Antegrade stenting of the bile duct – the pros and cons. Al`manah Instituta hirurgii imeni A.V. 2017; 1: 1083-1084. (In Russ).
9. Korolev MP, Fedotov LE, Avanesyan RG, et al. Combined minimally invasive interventions for complicated choledocholithiasis. Al`manah Instituta hirurgii imeni A.V. Vishnevskogo. 2017; 1: 715. (In Russ).
10. Fedorov VE, Vlasov AP, Fedosejkin IV. Obstructive jaundice nonneoplastic origin. Moskva: Nauka; 2014. 233 p. (In Russ).
11. Fedorov VE, Kharitonov BS, Maslyakov VV, et al. Features of the course of mechanical jaundice caused by complications of cholelithiasis. Vestnik hirurgii im. I.I. Grekova. 2020; 179(3): 48-57. (In Russ).
12. Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclough P, et al. Risk factors for complication following ERCP; results of a large-scale, prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2007; 39(9): 793-801. doi:10.1055/s-2007-966723.
13. Testoni PA, Mariani A, Aabakken L, et al. Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2016; 48: 657-683. doi:10.1055/s-0042-108641.
14. Kuzovleva YuV. Percutaneous interventions in abdominal surgery. Moskva: GEOTAR-Media; 2016. 192 p. (In Russ).
15. Williams E, Beckingham I, Sayed G, et al. Updated guideline on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Gut. 2017; 66(5): 765-782. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312317.
16. Cosfamada G, Boskovski I. Current treatment of benign stricturs. Annals of gastroenterology. 2013; 26: 37-40.
17. Abouleish AE, Leib ML, Cohen NH. ASA provides examples to each ASA physical status class. ASA Monitor. 2015; 79: 38-9 [URL].
18. Hurwitz EE, Simon M, Vinta SR, et al. Adding examples to the ASA-Physical Status classification improves correct assignments to patients. Anesthesiology. 2017; 126: 614-22. doi:10.1097/01.sa.0000527547.48413.d7.
19. Mayhew D, Mendonca V, Murthy BVS. A review of ASA physical status –historical perspectives and modern developments. Anaesthesia. 2019; 74: 373-379. doi:10.1111/anae.14569.
